Ok so I have another quick question. This time about a particular event.

Would you prefer an event using the Headhunter gametype or Slayer gametype.

Anyone would be able to join, and Hammers and Swords would be used. But, would it be better to use Headhunter with skulls falling from dead players or Slayer with points for each kill?

They are both similar gametypes imo, but Headhunter depends on skulls and goal zones and the winner may not necessarily be the best with the Hammer or Sword.

Would anyone like to comment on why they favor Headhunter or Slayer?

Headhunter just because it's different and I find it more fun.

What type of slayer would it be?

Slayer with Hammers and Swords. No Teams.

I like the idea of Headhunter, it gives players another objective rather than just slaying.

I would have to go with headhunter. In headhunter you need to be more weary of dying unlike slayer; you need to focus on more staying alive and knowing exactly were you are relative to the capture point. As a tank in a match just staying alive and having a presence is all you need to protect you're side of the court or even the goal. With headhunter you also need to push to where the capture point is which is like getting that last little push into the opposing goal line.

Headhunter just seems more Grifbally to me than regular slayer.

+1 ditto